Lv2PADmppo

uigh4e3wq

Stand up public security department,air max personnalisé, Justice has
Southern News reporter Chen Wan Pan sound as correspondent customized vehicle violation notification message, but did not receive a SMS notification violation, the owner in the same place for five after the speeding violation, angrily put a communications company to court seeking compensation for the same lot of follow-up violation fines losses. Recently, the Guangzhou Panyu District Court heard the case, ruled that the company lost.
Fined five times the same place without SMS notification
2008 onwards,http://ro.diy-jp.info/sky/est1117/cgi-bin/est-frm03/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=viewres&target=152313/, Guangzhou Panyu Guangdong public  for their AX ×× 5 on vehicles at a communications company for the province's vehicle violation notification service, pay 3 yuan per month. April 18, 2012,hollister mens shorts hollister retailers uk, he received the original 4S shop tips sent to inform the vehicle has five traffic violations. Li Moujie after the inquiry found that from 2012 January 8 to March 26,fabbrica scarpe hogan outlet torino hogan, he was speeding Shunde five times in the same place, and the telecommunications company did not SMS notification.
After  consultation and communications company, the other only willing to compensate four months of 12 yuan fee information. Huff,abercrombie and fitch en france magasin abercrombie en france, he sued the company in Panyu District People's Court,http://www.qu100.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=35967,abercrombie punti vendita telefono abercrombie milano, ask for compensation after their fourth violation fines worth a total of 600 yuan a whole,free hollister, to return the pay information costs, and compensation for mental damages himself, lost income,http://www.fjct.fit.ac.jp/pukurin/oa/cgi-bin/bbs/patio.cgi,outlet brescia hogan hogan pe 2014, fees and transportation expenses All losses.
In court,http://www.msknet.com/bbs/mbbs.cgi,maglioni woolrich, the defendant was fined the owners think the direct cause of their own violation of traffic rules,http://cgi.geocities.jp/yoppadon/geocgi/golf/golf22.cgi/</"/, do not agree with all the claims of the owners .
Communications alleged breach owners need to pay a fine
Panyu court found that the illegal source of information is the Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau's Golden Shield network. Prior to June 2011, the province can provide information about traffic violations,air max noir et blanche air max triax, after June 2011,abercrombie kids fair oaks mall, due to the Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau's Golden Shield network system upgrade,http://www.u6u5.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=142157, that only provide local traffic violations within the scope of the information in Guangzhou City.
Panyu court held that since June 2011, services provided by the defendant to the plaintiff reduces the amount of information than before. In this regard, the right to know the plaintiff,www f50 adidas com, the defendant to the plaintiff should be clearly informed of this situation. But the information sent by the defendant, on the one hand for the "off-site" scope is not clear; the other hand, a "temporary" can not query when the query can not be determined. Such as the plaintiff in the January 8,giubbotti moncler estivi, 2012 in case of traffic violations,http://champion-fukuoka.com/bbs/bbs.cgi, the defendant to the plaintiff timely prompt to inform the plaintiff may avoid after four in the same place for the same violations fined.
Therefore, the court held that the communications company Panyu should timely inform bear the liability for breach of duty to the plaintiff for its failure to perform a complete verdict traffic violation fines after the loss of four 600 yuan compensation  its owners,http://www.betbbs.cc/thread-807213-1-1.html, dismissed the plaintiff Lee The remaining claims Jie.